Suing The City Of Philadelphia And Sovereign Immunity

 Posted on June 22, 2022 in Sue The City

Good morning and welcome to Ask Andy. This is a daily podcast about personal injury practice in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I’m Andrew Neuwirth. You can reach me on the Web at Neuwirthlaw.com or by phone at 215-259-3687. So I’m talking today again about suing the city of Philadelphia. There are lots of ways to sue the city, but there is one big sort of bar or thing you need to know about, and that is that traditionally you cannot sue the government, whether it’s state or federal or county, unless they give you permission to do so. So it’s kind of an alien concept to your average person in America, but it comes down to us from old England, I think. And you needed the permission of the king to sue the king. So we have some of that come through in our law. And basically you are allowed to sue the city of Philadelphia only in certain circumstances. And even if you sue them and win, you are limited to a reward or an award of 500,000. And if you sue the state of Pennsylvania, your award is limited to 250,000. That’s just a couple of the little vagaries of the law. But, you know, basically the reason is kind of good and bad. We don’t want people constantly suing the city or the township and wasting their time. But at the same time, there are reasons why we need to sue the city, and there are times when the city should be sued. So the primary exceptions to suing the city of Philadelphia are, if you are injured or something happens as a result of streets or sidewalks.

Continue Reading ››

SuperLawyers 2022 Top Rated Personal Injury Attorney

 Posted on May 27, 2022 in In the News

I am thrilled and honored to be selected as top Pennsylvania Personal Injury attorney by 2022 Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers chooses only the top 5% of attorneys in any region. I am proud to be included along with many of my talented colleagues.

Top Rated King of Prussia, PA Personal Injury Attorney | Andrew Neuwirth | Super Lawyers

Andrew T. Neuwirth is a top-rated attorney practicing in the King of Prussia, Pennsylvania area. Providing legal representation in Pennsylvania for a variety of different issues, Andrew Neuwirth was selected to Super Lawyers for 2022. He is admitted to practice before the courts in Pennsylvania. After completing undergraduate studies, Andrew T.

Continue Reading ››

Suit: Woman slips after taking off shoes at Philadelphia International TSA checkpoint

 Posted on May 23, 2022 in In the News

Suit: Woman slips after taking off shoes at Philadelphia International TSA checkpoint

PHILADEPHIA – A woman alleges she slipped after removing her shoes at a security checkpoint at Philadelphia International. Jacqueline Allen-Fillmore filed a complaint April 26 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Philadelphia International Airport and the City of Philadelphia alleging negligence.

Continue Reading ››

DOES DR. STRANGE HAVE A WORKMEN’S COMP CASE?

 Posted on May 11, 2022 in Uncategorized

Marvel’s ‘Doctor Strange.’ All images © 2016 Marvel. All Rights Reserved.

TEXTING AND DRIVING CAN CRUSH YOUR HANDS BUT SAVE THE PLANET?

So, the opening five minutes of the original Dr. Strange movie shows our hero, Benedict Cumberbatch as the future Dr. Strange, distractedly driving his Lamborghini on a country road while reading brain CT scans on his phone on his car console.  He then proceeds to crash because he is distracted from watching the road.  His hands are crushed, which makes him unable to do his job as a neurosurgeon. So, he goes to Kharmataj and is able to save Earth. Yay earth.

Anyway, so, don’t read CT scans and drive or some similar statement by me.

Texting and driving has revived a whole swath of personal injury law practice. Society had finally moved towards drunk driving being culturally unacceptable and the DUI numbers were down over the past decade. Unfortunately, texting or snapchat or other distractions have more than replaced DUI crashes. So, the texting and driving cases usually involve hitting other cars from the rear at high speed or swerving into oncoming traffic.  Both of these are bad for the victims.

Continue Reading ››

Considerations in Cases Involving Minors or Children

 Posted on May 11, 2022 in Uncategorized

 

Kids and Dogs

Most of my serious dog bite cases involve children for various reasons. Children are shorter and hence get face to face with dogs more readily and are more prone to be bitten in the torso, hands, head etc. whereas an adult will take an attack on the legs. Secondly, children are more trusting or less self-protective around dogs and do not perceive potential dangers like adults do.  Children are often the most sympathetic victims and most lawyers on both sides are very careful and receptive to settlement in these cases.

Orphan’s court

Before any case involving a minor ends with a settlement check, the case must go to Orphan’s Court for review by a common pleas judge. This is a nice protection to have for several reasons. First, it reassures the child’s parent that their lawyer, me, did a good job for them, as the judge usually says you are receiving a nice sum of money and you should be satisfied with the settlement. Secondly, it allows both me and opposing counsel a chance to gain the blessing of the Court over the whole settlement. Courts usually require that plaintiff’s counsel take a reduced fee of 25 percent rather than the usual 33 percent or higher. This is also a selling point to the family as they know that their child is getting a break from the lawyer and the blessing of the Court. Finally, and somewhat frustratingly, usually, no matter how rich or poor, the Court usually requires the minor’s settlement money to be put in a savings account for the day they turn 18. At that point, the funds become theirs with no strings. Sometimes, certain judges will allow money to be placed into college savings accounts and sometimes some money is set aside for care of the child if the family is in abject poverty. But, those situations are the exception to the rule.

Continue Reading ››

THE HARDEST CASES (AND THE EASY ONES TOO)

 Posted on May 09, 2022 in Uncategorized

 

THE EASIEST CASE FOR THE LAWYER:

The easiest case I encounter is one where the insurance does not nearly cover the value of the injury. So, let’s say that you are a pedestrian and a car jumps the curb in center city Philadelphia, hits you, and breaks your leg. You have surgery and need three months to recover. You have a lien on your settlement of $30,000 and the driver who hit you has the Pennsylvania state minimum auto insurance coverage of $15,000. I would estimate your injury as having a value of $200,000 or so. Since your injury far outweighs the insurance, the insurer will tender or just pay the fifteen thousand to me for the client upon me producing medical records showing the fracture and surgery. Maybe your own car insurance has additional underinsured motorist coverage, but it still likely will not be sufficient.  This is my easiest case. It is not the best case for the client because they will walk away with far less than the full value of their injury, but that is how the world works in personal injury. If the person who hit you had minimal coverage, it is unlikely that they will have any assets worth even thinking about pursuing.

Continue Reading ››

Lawyers: Let’s Network at Scarpetta’s: May 12, 2022

 Posted on April 29, 2022 in Uncategorized

As Lawyers, we know that the best cases come from colleagues, and so I thought I’d invite a few of you Neusletter subscribers to dinner. I’m hosting a table May 12, 6:30 PM at Scarpetta, and the first seven people to respond will be my guests. we’re going to do a bunch of these, so if you don’t get in the first go, we’ll have you out soon!

To attend, fill out the form below:

Networking Dinner at Scarpetta: May 12, 2022, 6:30 PM

Suing the City: when Motorcycles Hit Potholes

 Posted on April 29, 2022 in Ask Andy Podcast

This episode tackles motorcycles hitting potholes and suing the city to me as a serious injury lawyer.

Transcript

Good morning, welcome to Ask Andy, this is a daily podcast about personal injury practice in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I’m Andrew Neuwirth. This podcast is sponsored by my law firm, Neuwirth Law Office. King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.  We are in the suburbs of Philadelphia. You can reach me at 267-3563-1735 or at my office 215-259-3687. So I wanted to talk to you today about motorcycle accidents caused by your local city. So I handle a fair amount of motorcycle accidents and I handle a fair amount of kind of pothole caused injuries, and oftentimes they come together with obviously expected bad results. So,  what’s the typical scenario? I see the typical scenario is motorcycle riding along clear road. No bad weather, no cars around hits a pothole, flies off the motorcycle and breaks a toe, breaks a leg, hits a guardrail and dies and everything in between. So the question is like, well,  know from the lawyer’s point of view, am I interested in that? Is that something I want to work on? And the answer generally is yes. I mean, a lot of people,  car drivers will generally tell me just in passing, though, I don’t like motorcycles. Don’t put me on your jury because,  to some extent, people say, well,  you’re riding a motorcycle, you kind of assume the risk of whatever happened to you. So, you know, one that’s not what the law says, but that may be what the average person thinks.

Continue Reading ››

Sovereign immunity: You Need Permission to Sue the Government

 Posted on April 28, 2022 in Case Matters

 

           An age-old concept from olde England.

 

Suing the City of Philadelphia:

I get a lot of calls from people wanting to sue the City of Philadelphia or other municipalities. For various reasons, good and bad, there are limits on when you can sue the City.  First, you must fall into one of the exceptions to sovereign immunity or the Tort Claims Act.  The primary exceptions I deal with are the vehicle exception, the sidewalk exception, and the real property exception. So, if you are hit by a police car or garbage truck, slip in a hole on a sidewalk, or drive your motorcycle into a pothole, you can pursue a case provided you meet certain threshold requirements.

The threshold requirements to pursue a case are as follows:

First, you must file a notice with the City alerting them to your claim within six months! Failure to do this is a problem. It is less of a problem if the client was unrepresented and was not aware of the requirement. It’s more of a problem if the lawyer fails to file the notice. So, we prefer to file the notice in every case, no matter how big or small. Sometimes, the City helps your case by responding to these notices and telling you that PennDot or someone else was at fault. There is a line of case law addressing how to deal with failures to provide the City with notice, but it is not an area of law you want to be researching.

Continue Reading ››

PRACTICE TIP: BOILERPLATE PLEADINGS

 Posted on April 11, 2022 in Uncategorized

        

   Boilerplate is just part of being a lawyer. There are tried and true ways of doing things that save time and money and protect us from missing routine things. I have a fee agreement that is tuned just the way I like it after many years of use. Now, it’s essentially boilerplate. However, boilerplate is often used by the defense bar to assert every possible affirmative defense under the sun, to protect unanticipated developments down the road. Often, I see affirmative defenses asserting that the statute of limitations has expired when it plainly has not. I basically ignore it though some of my colleagues get bent out of shape about it.

Recently, however, I had filed a federal court lawsuit and defense counsel had asserted the usual litany of all possible affirmative defenses applicable to an automobile case, though my case involved premises liability. Unfortunately for my opposing counsel, the Court chose to go line by line through every affirmative defense and suggesting that asserting inapplicable defenses was sanctionable conduct, if they were not withdrawn at the conference. Certainly, it was an uncomfortable phone conference! So, watch out and don’t do that in Federal Court.

Continue Reading ››